Housing Policy Debate

期刊简介：Housing Policy Debate has since 1990 published cutting edge, original research that evaluates and informs housing and community development policy. Subjects include (but are not limited to) affordable housing, housing instability and homelessness, housing finance, housing for renter or owner-occupancy, neighborhood revitalization, housing-related poverty alleviation and integration strategies, metropolitan residential development trends, land use policy, segregation, and inequalities in access to housing by ethnic/racial, household/family, Indigeneity, transnational immigration, gender/sexuality, and other dimensions of societal diversity. The Journal also aims to explore linkages between housing policy and health, finance, energy, environmental, and transportation policies through interdisciplinary approaches. The Journal welcomes manuscripts examining these topics in any national context, so long as they have wide applicability. The Journal seeks to highlight current debate on these topics through Forum sections that feature a central article with responding comments that represent a range of perspectives. Housing Policy Debate also features an occasional Outlook section, where the editors and advisory board members comment on emerging areas of housing and community development research or current events. Our objective is to disseminate widely the best current thinking on housing and housing-related policy. Peer Review Statement All submissions undergo a rigorous peer review process, based on initial editor screening and double-anonymized review by at least two reviewers. Housing Policy Debate applies the following criteria during the review process: Manuscripts should be theoretically and empirically informed investigations that engage questions relevant to housing markets and policies, conduct rigorous evaluations of housing and neighborhood development programs, and/or develop innovative theories or concepts related to housing and neighborhoods. They must clearly identify gaps in the scholarly literature their research helps close and make clear their contributions to theoretical or empirical issues related to housing policy. Applicability of findings to formulating specific policies and programs having general interest must be explicit. Scholars with an excellent record as peer reviewer for HPD may be invited to join our Editorial Board. Scholars who wish to serve as peer reviewers for HPD should email the editorial office (hpd.eic@gmail.com), listing their areas of expertise.

【译文】住房政策辩论自 1990 年以来一直发表前沿的原创研究，评估住房和社区发展政策并为其提供信息。主题包括（但不限于）经济适用住房、住房不稳定和无家可归、住房融资、租房者或自住住房、邻里振兴、与住房相关的扶贫和融合战略、大都市住宅发展趋势、土地使用政策、种族隔离、民族/种族、家庭/家庭、原住民、跨国移民、性别/性取向以及社会多样性的其他方面在获得住房方面的不平等。该杂志还旨在通过跨学科方法探讨住房政策与健康、金融、能源、环境和交通政策之间的联系。 《华尔街日报》欢迎在任何国家背景下研究这些主题的手稿，只要它们具有广泛的适用性。该杂志试图通过论坛部分突出当前关于这些主题的辩论，其中包括一篇中心文章以及代表一系列观点的回应评论。住房政策辩论还偶尔设有展望部分，编辑和顾问委员会成员对住房和社区发展研究的新兴领域或时事发表评论。我们的目标是广泛传播当前有关住房和住房相关政策的最佳思想。同行评审声明 所有提交的内容都经过严格的同行评审流程，基于最初的编辑筛选和至少两名审稿人的双重匿名评审。住房政策辩论在审查过程中适用以下标准：手稿应是理论和经验丰富的调查，涉及与住房市场和政​​策相关的问题，对住房和社区发展计划进行严格评估，和/或发展与住房和社区相关的创新理论或概念。他们必须清楚地识别他们的研究有助于弥补的学术文献中的空白，并明确他们对与住房政策相关的理论或实证问题的贡献。研究结果对于制定具有普遍利益的具体政策和计划的适用性必须明确。作为 HPD 同行评审员具有出色记录的学者可能会被邀请加入我们的编辑委员会。希望担任 HPD 同行评审员的学者应发送电子邮件至编辑部 (hpd.eic@gmail.com)，列出他们的专业领域。