Exemplaria

期刊简介：Launched in 1989, Exemplaria publishes papers that reconsider the methods and aims of scholarship on the medieval and early modern periods, broadly conceived. Authors are invited to submit work that promotes the journal’s interpretive aims and moves, engages critical theories, or otherwise seeks to sharpen the edges of current intellectual or literary debates. The editors are committed to a rigorous, productive, and strictly anonymous process of peer review, which is usually completed within three months. 1. Editorial and Advisory Boards: We strive to maintain diverse editorial and advisory boards, with the aim of publishing a journal that not only reflects the current breadth of approaches in our interdisciplinary field, but works to cultivate a widened range of voices and work. We actively seek contributors who are diverse with respect to race, gender, academic position, and academic affiliation. The editorial board is formed via internal nominations for replacement when necessary, typically for five-year individual terms. The advisory board is formed via editorial board nominationsfor replacement at two-year intervals; nominations may also be solicited from current advisory board members . The editorial board reads submissions on a rotating basis, not determined by specialization; all editors participate in all decisions to accept or reject articles. Advisory board members may expect to read up to two submissions per year, depending upon submission topics. 2. Review Process: Exemplaria uses an anonymous review process. The editorial board has a strong responsibility to oversee the review process, preserving anonymity on both sides so that reports may be written freely, as well as ensuring the quality of the reports. While we do not share the identities of reviewers, we may share their areas of expertise in order to situate their reports. Editors reserve the right to make final decisions, seek additional reviews, and decline to share unprofessional reviews with authors. Reviewers may be notified of the outcome of the review process upon request. 3. Evaluative Criteria: Exemplaria seeks to publish articles and review essays that sharpen current intellectual, aesthetic, and cultural debates in medieval and early modern studies. We expect articles to make original contributions, advance the use of theory, and be inclusive and diverse in their citations; we therefore ask reviewers to evaluate essays according to these criteria, stated in our review form. Editors periodically review the content of published volumes and strive to redress omitted or underrepresented voices and work.

【译文】Exemplaria 于 1989 年推出，发表的论文从广义上重新考虑中世纪和近代早期的学术方法和目标。我们邀请作者提交能够促进该杂志的解释目标和行动、参与批判理论或以其他方式试图尖锐当前知识或文学辩论的边缘的作品。编辑们致力于严格、高效且严格匿名的同行评审过程，通常在三个月内完成。 1. 编辑和顾问委员会：我们努力维持多元化的编辑和顾问委员会，目的是出版一本不仅反映我们跨学科领域当前方法广度的期刊，而且致力于培养更广泛的声音和工作。我们积极寻找在种族、性别、学术地位和学术背景方面多样化的贡献者。编辑委员会是通过内部提名组建的，必要时更换，通常任期五年。顾问委员会由编辑委员会提名组成，每两年更换一次；还可以向现任顾问委员会成员征求提名。编辑委员会轮流阅读投稿，不按专业决定；所有编辑参与接受或拒绝文章的所有决定。顾问委员会成员每年可能会阅读最多两份提交的材料，具体取决于提交的主题。 2. 审核流程：Exemplaria 采用匿名审核流程。编辑委员会负有监督评审过程的重大责任，保持双方匿名，以便报告可以自由撰写，并确保报告的质量。虽然我们不分享审稿人的身份，但我们可能会分享他们的专业领域，以便确定他们的报告的位置。编辑保留做出最终决定、寻求额外评论并拒绝与作者分享不专业评论的权利。根据要求，可以将审核过程的结果通知审核人员。 3. 评价标准：Exemplaria 寻求发表文章和评论文章，以尖锐化当前中世纪和早期现代研究中的知识、美学和文化辩论。我们期望文章做出原创性贡献，促进理论的应用，并在引用中具有包容性和多样性；因此，我们要求审稿人根据我们的审稿表中规定的这些标准来评估论文。编辑定期审查已出版书籍的内容，并努力纠正被遗漏或代表性不足的声音和作品。