Planning Theory & Practice

期刊简介：Planning Theory & Practice provides an international focus for the development of theory and practice in spatial planning and a forum to promote the policy dimensions of space and place. Planning Theory & Practice aims to challenge theory and change practice and is distinctive in its commitment to publishing content which combines intellectual rigour with practical impact. The Editors invite theoretically informed and robustly researched papers which raise issues at the leading edge of planning theory and practice. Papers on controversial subjects are welcomed and supported. Authors are requested to draw out the wider significance of their particular contribution and to write for a broad disciplinary and international audience. The journal’s innovative Interface section adopts an original approach to stimulating critical and challenging debate through academic publishing. This includes promoting dialogue between the academic and practitioner communities, encouraging analytical reflection on practice and practical engagement with theory. Each issue of Interface offers a multifaceted investigation of a topical theme, in the form of a series of contributions reflecting on an issue from different perspectives. The journal’s Comments and Reviews section comprises Policy & Planning Briefs, which provide critical insights into key policy developments and analysis of spatial plans, Book Reviews, and Comments on a current issue and rejoinders to articles previously published. The range of Planning Theory & Practice includes: • Developing the theoretical and methodological foundations of planning theory and practice, as well as urban studies more generally; • Developing the contributions of the planning field to social science, both analytically and normatively; • Exploring the relationship between theory and practice, including reviews which examine emergent practices and interpret them in the light of current intellectual debates; • Challenging the impact of intellectual ideas through critical reflection and review; • Examining policy development in particular fields such as housing, regeneration, transport, urban design, participatory practice, diversity and climate change. The journal is co-owned by the Royal Town Planning Institute and Taylor & Francis Peer Review Statement All research articles submitted to the journal undergo a rigorous peer review process, based on initial editor screening and anonymized refereeing by at least three referees. Interface articles are subject to rigorous peer and editorial review and revision prior to a decision about publication. Comments and Policy & Planning Briefs are commissioned by the Editors, and all commissions are subject to rigorous editorial review and revision before publication. Authors can choose to publish gold open access in this journal. Patsy Healey Award for the Best Paper Published in Planning Theory & Practice The paper nominated by P lanning Theory & Practice for the AESOP award has been named the Patsy Healey Award for the Best Paper Published in Planning Theory & Practice . This year (2025) this award went to Harriet Dunn for Populism, Planning, and the Politics of Discontent Recent AESOP Prize Success for PTP For many years papers published in the journal have either won or been short-listed for the highly prestigious Association of European Schools of Planning (AESOP) Best Paper Prize. In 2025, Harriet Dunn's paper won for Populism, Planning, and the Politics of Discontent AESOP Prize Success for PTP In 2024 Pia Backlund et al. were shortlisted for Accepting Depoliticisation? Council Members’ Attitudes Towards Public-Public Contracts in Spatial Planning In 2023 Katherine Brookfield won for her paper entitled Planned Out: The Discriminatory Effects of Planning’s Regulation of Small Houses in Multiple Occupation in England In 2022 Nobukhosi Ngwenya and Liza Rose Cirolia were shortlisted for Conflicts Between and Within: the ‘Conflicting Rationalities’ of Informal Occupation in South Africa . In 2021 Janice Barry and Michelle Thompson-Fawcett were shortlisted for Decolonizing the Boundaries between the ‘Planner’ and the ‘Planned’: Implications of Indigenous Property Development In 2020 Juliana M. Zanotto was shortlisted for Detachment in Planning Practice In 2019 Babak Manouchehrifar was shortlisted for Is Planning ‘Secular’? Rethinking Religion, Secularism, and Planning In 2018 two of our papers were shortlisted: Nicholas Blomley for Land Use, Planning, and the “difficult character of property” and Aftab Erfan for Confronting Collective Traumas: an Exploration of Therapeutic Planning In 2016 Howell Baum was shortlisted for Planning With Half a Mind: Why Planners Resist Emotion In 2015 Mee Kam Ng won the AESOP Best Published Paper Award for her article Intellectuals and the production of space in the urban renewal process in Hong Kong and Taipei . In 2014 Petter Naess et al were shortlisted for the AESOP prize, for their article ‘ Knowledge-based land use and transport planning? Consistency and gap between ‘state-of-the-art’ knowledge and knowledge claims in planning documents in three Scandinavian city regions ’ In 2013 Paul Lawless and Sarah Pearson were shortlisted for their article: ‘ Outcomes from Community Engagement in Urban Regeneration: Evidence from England's New Deal for Communities Programme ’ In 2011 Paula Meth was shortlisted. Her article 'Unsettling Insurgency: Reflections on Women's Insurgent Practice in South Africa ' was praised by the judges for its unflinching and nuanced account of the repressive, as well as the positive, aspects of insurgency. Similarly 2010 saw Kevin Krizek and Carissa Schively Slotterback's article 'Is There a Role for Evidence-Based Practice in Urban Planning and Policy? ' shortlisted for outstanding contribution to the debate on the integration of planning theory into everyday practice. In 2009, Mee Kam Ng's paper, 'From Government to Governance? Planning in the First Decade of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region ' was shortlisted for its incisive discussion of the controversies surrounding the development of the Victoria Harbour, Hong Kong. 2008 likewise saw recognition for an article by Enrico Gualini and S Majoor, 'Innovative Practices in Large Urban Development Projects: Conflicting Frames in the Quest for New Urbanity '. In 2006, the prize was won outright by Dr Kate Shaw, with an original interpretation of the role of city cultures as a form of heritage. 'The Place of Alternative Culture and the Politics of its Protection in Berlin, Amsterdam and Melbourne ' was praised by the judges for tackling 'important paradoxes for planners in multicultural cities'. Endorsements " Planning Theory & Practice (PTP) has quickly become a major force in the field of urban and regional planning scholarship...the speed with which PTP has become a magnet for the best scholarly authors in planning is astounding. I believe it now ranks as one of the top five English language planning journals in the world, in terms of the quality of the work published." Professor Bruce Stiftel 2004 President of the Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning (USA) “To submit my manuscript to Planning Theory and Practice was a very fruitful learning experience. The commentary offered by the journal was very accurate and provided a constructive critique using a very motivating tone. I recommend the journal to all those authors who have great ideas and still few experience in publishing in high impact journals on planning. The positive feeling, which all the editors transmit, really helps to motivate the work needed to advance the quality of your manuscripts.” Enza Lissandrello “If you are concerned about the quality of life in either your neighborhood, city or region; feel enthusiastic and knowledgeable about a planning effort to improve the situation; and want to share your insights about the planning process or its outcome, please, consider writing an article for Planning Theory and Practice (PTP). PTP bridges the conventional divide between theory and practice of planning: it provides a forum for individuals who want to transcend such conceptual dichotomies and are inspired by complex but hopeful analyses of planning processes and outcomes. PTP 's intellectual scope and institutional reach are both local and global: whether you care to write about planning of your neighborhood or that of cites and regions in other nations, PTP offers you a deliberative forum of the highest quality with a large number of contributors. I urge you to join this international and exceptional forum on the theoretical underpinnings of effective planning practice.” Bish Sanyal

【译文】规划理论与实践为空间规划理论和实践的发展提供了国际焦点，并为促进空间和场所的政策层面提供了一个论坛。 《规划理论与实践》旨在挑战理论和改变实践，其独特之处在于致力于出版将学术严谨性与实际影响相结合的内容。编辑们邀请具有丰富理论知识和经过深入研究的论文，这些论文提出了规划理论和实践前沿的问题。关于有争议主题的论文受到欢迎和支持。作者被要求阐明其特定贡献的更广泛意义，并为广泛的学科和国际读者写作。该杂志的创新界面部分采用原创方法，通过学术出版激发批判性和挑战性的辩论。这包括促进学术界和从业者群体之间的对话，鼓励对实践的分析反思以及对理论的实际参与。每期《界面》都以一系列从不同角度反映某个问题的贡献的形式，对某个主题进行多方面的调查。该杂志的评论和评论部分包括政策和规划简报，其中提供了对关键政策发展和空间规划分析的批判性见解、书评以及对当前问题的评论以及对先前发表的文章的反驳。规划理论与实践的范围包括： • 发展规划理论与实践以及更广泛的城市研究的理论和方法基础。 • 发展规划领域对社会科学的分析和规范贡献； • 探索理论与实践之间的关系，包括审查新兴实践并根据当前的学术辩论对其进行解释； • 通过批判性反思和回顾来挑战知识思想的影响； • 审查住房、重建、交通、城市设计、参与性实践、多样性和气候变化等特定领域的政策制定。该期刊由皇家城市规划研究所和泰勒与弗朗西斯同行评审声明共同拥有。提交给该期刊的所有研究文章都经过严格的同行评审过程，基于初步的编辑筛选和至少三名审稿人的匿名审稿。在决定发表之前，界面文章要经过严格的同行和编辑审查和修改。评论和政策与规划简报由编辑委托，所有委托在出版前都经过严格的编辑审查和修订。作者可以选择在该期刊上发表黄金开放获取。 Patsy Healey 规划理论与实践最佳论文奖 由规划理论与实践提名的 AESOP 奖论文被授予 Patsy Healey 规划理论与实践最佳论文奖。今年（2025 年），哈丽特·邓恩 (Harriet Dunn) 凭借民粹主义、规划和不满政治获得了该奖项。 PTP 最近获得 AESOP 奖 多年来，该杂志上发表的论文要么赢得要么入围享有盛誉的欧洲规划学院协会 (AESOP) 最佳论文奖。 2025 年，Harriet Dunn 的论文荣获民粹主义、规划和不满政治 AESOP 奖，2024 年 PTP 获得成功 Pia Backlund 等人。入围接受去政治化？理事会成员对空间规划中公-公共合同的态度 2023 年，凯瑟琳·布鲁克菲尔德 (Katherine Brookfield) 凭借题为“规划出局：英国多重占用中小型房屋规划监管的歧视性影响”的论文获奖。 2022 年，Nobukhosi Ngwenya 和 Liza Rose Cirolia 因《内部与内部的冲突：英国非正规占用的“冲突理性”》入围。南非。 2021 年，Janice Barry 和 Michelle Thompson-Fawcett 入围《去殖民化“规划者”与“被规划者”之间的界限：本土房地产开发的影响》。 2020 年，Juliana M. Zanotto 入围《规划实践中的分离》。 2019 年，Babak Manouchehrifar 入围《规划是否“世俗”？》重新思考宗教、世俗主义和规划 2018 年，我们的两篇论文入围：尼古拉斯·布洛姆利 (Nicholas Blomley) 的土地利用、规划和“d